Archive for February, 2012

Golf on TV: Snitching & Spitting

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

Watching golf last weekend, two incidents left a rather unsavoury taste in my mouth. As you may have seen or read, the first taste of bile came courtesy of the disqualification of Scotland’s Peter Whiteford from the Avantha Masters.  Just one stroke off the lead, Whiteford had to endure being told on the 4th tee of the final round that he was being disqualified for an incident that happened on the final hole the day before, and in so being, he became the latest victim of TV viewers contacting the Tour to indicate a rules infraction.

Peter Whiteford won’t give a jot whether the phrase is coined as ‘Trial by Television’ or ‘TV Snitching’ but, to my mind, this is a rule that desperately needs changing.  He handled himself with great dignity and professionalism in the aftermath, but I’m sure he was inwardly cursing the snitch that denied him a shot of a first European Tour title last weekend.

And this has nothing to do with cheating or ‘getting away with it’.  Whiteford was rightly cleared of any deliberate foul play and he immediately went on record as saying that the blame lay with him – if he’d had any doubt he should’ve checked the television replay himself.  Well, technically he’s probably right, but one suspects that 99% of the golfing population felt enormous sympathy for him.

For my money, he shouldn’t have been disqualified. I understand that the rules have to be applied with rigour and the European Tour therefore had little choice, and I respect the argument that if he had any doubt at all he should’ve checked the replay before signing his card.  But let’s look at what actually happened.  Whiteford did ask his caddy and playing partner whether the ball moved, as he wasn’t sure, and they both said that they hadn’t seen it move.  Take away the cameras and that would have sufficed.  The great irony is that, despite a rule change last year following the disqualification of Padraig Harrington in similar circumstances, if Whiteford hadn’t asked his playing partner and caddy (in so doing, he demonstrated that he himself had some doubt), he wouldn’t have been disqualified.

So, no one in the group saw anything wrong and on he played, finishing and signing for a level par 72.  What Whiteford hadn’t accounted for was some busy-body TV viewers contacting the European Tour to tell them Whiteford’s ball had moved, a fact that that was upheld by the rules committee on viewing replays.  OK, you could argue that the cameras and the TV viewers were only helping to apply the rules of the game, but to my mind this is patently unfair. The only players being scrutinised are those being filmed at the moment of indiscretion – I thought sport was supposed to be played ‘on a level playing field’?  Trial by television in golf simply doesn’t allow that – it’s  the equivalent of introducing goal line technology at only one end of a football ground.

Perhaps Whiteford should’ve asked for a television replay himself, appreciating that he did have some doubt, but I think it worth bearing in mind that whilst he’s clearly a good player, he’s not currently a household name commanding attention from the television cameras every time he tees it up.  I’d bet that the concept of ‘trial by television’ is even more concerning for the likes of McIlroy and Donald, and therefore you’d imagine they are more practiced at ensuring everything gets reviewed if there is even the slightest question mark.  Whiteford did his best to play by the rules and he walked away with his dignity intact, if not as champion.

I’ve since read that the European Tour has said they ‘hope it doesn’t happen again’. Well it will, unless the rule is changed. It happened to Padraig last year (all be it at a slightly earlier stage of the tournament, although that shouldn’t make the blindest bit of difference), and it will happen again. Surely they have to introduce a rule to protect the players from armchair referees.

My big issue, however, is with the ‘jobsworth’ folk who are actually emailing in. Yes, I know that technically, you WERE correct, Whiteford should’ve incurred a penalty and having failed to do so, signing for the wrong score could only mean one thing: disqualification. You must feel very proud of yourselves. But why do you feel it your responsibility to point it out? Can you not let the traditional etiquette and official referees police the game, as they do for all the other players in the event?

I remember reading an article when John Paramor (European Tour Referee) was interviewed regarding how amateurs faired in club competitions. The crux of it was that most amateur golfers break the rules on multiple occasions over the course of the round, without even knowing it. An incorrect drop here, wrongly taken relief there, amateurs think they know the rules better than they really do. Unless you’re John Paramor, it’s practically impossible to maintain an encyclopaedic knowledge of the rules of golf, so you can pretty much guarantee that these same people who call and email in, are guilty of breaking the rules themselves.  I don’t suppose they would enjoy their golf very much if they were “DQ’d” every week, and even less so if it came courtesy of an over-zealous dog walker or greenkeeper dashing up to the clubhouse to report an infringement of Rule 18-2(a). Maybe the ‘armchair referees’ should bear this in mind next time they feel impelled to email their observations.

So, all this ruined one man’s chances of winning and the enjoyment of hundreds of thousands of fans.  Which brings me to my second bitter aftertaste, and something which would also have spoiled the enjoyment for legions of fans, many of whom did complain (and with some justification).  This time, of course, nothing was done about it.

Slow play (also a rules infringement) is painful enough, but accompany it with endless spitting and it becomes unwatchable.  Keegan Bradley was the guilty party over in the US, though he isn’t alone amongst the top American golfers, Tiger being one of them.  Admittedly, spitting isn’t as reviled in the US as it is here and Bradley, to his credit, has since apologised and made a conscious effort to refrain from doing so.  (More than can be said for Tiger).  But my point is simply that, when it comes to overwhelming public opinion, justice wasn’t meted out very satisfactorily this weekend.

The Big Thaw

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

Guest Author: Chris Lomas, Secretary at Worplesdon Golf Club

Patience is the Key…

Winter golf and especially golf courses in the winter, have evolved over the last 20 years. Turf quality in the close season has improved immeasurably, as has the clothing which allows us to play in the most inclement weather. We are therefore playing a lot more golf, throughout the winter months, than we have ever done before. Expectations have also increased and whilst most people will tolerate a slight drop in turf quality and green speed, they still expect the courses they play to be in decent condition.

For this reason we must be tolerant when the snow begins to melt and/or the frozen grounds begins to thaw. This is when serious and long term damage can be done. More often than not, when the thaw is underway, the days can be mild and the sun can be shining. The snow has disappeared from the golfers gardens and this is where the problems often start. I know from experience that General Managers/Secretaries start to come under pressure from members to open the course and it can also be difficult to continually turn away important revenue, especially when the course looks not just playable but tempting from the clubhouse. However patience is vital and we must all respect the judgment of the Course Manager and here is why….

Without wishing to teach anyone to suck eggs, the thaw starts from the top. The frost can often penetrate the ground many inches down. When the snow starts to melt, apart from natural run off, the water has nowhere to run. In cannot permeate through the ground as it would normally as it is sat on a number of inches of frost. Even if there has not been any snow, the ground only freezes because of it’s moisture content. Therefore when the ground starts to thaw, the water just sits on the top, saturating the surfaces. Walking on such surfaces alone can be very damaging and the damage done can take months to repair. However, the real damage at this time is root break, especially on the fine turf areas such as the greens and tees. When the surface is soft and below is frozen, walking on the turf will break the roots and likely kill the plant. Multiply this with hundreds of footprints over a relatively small area and without exaggerating you can devastate your greens. Once again speaking from experience, this can take until well into to June to fully repair and all of a sudden you regret caving in to the desires of the golfers. Certainly there is not a golfer I know, who would still push to play once they are aware of the consequences if their actions.

So even if the weather is mild, your garden is clear and the course is looking very inviting, please try to respect the decision made by your Course Manager. Even if you think he is being over cautious, a few lost days of golf now can help prevent poor greens for months to come.

Chris Lomas is the Secretary of Worplesdon Golf Club. For 11 years prior to that he was Course Manager of The Berkshire Golf Club and prior to that was Deputy Head Greenkeeper at Swinley Forest Golf Club. You can read his blog articles by clicking on this link here.

Tralee GC Course Review

Wednesday, February 8th, 2012

Whenever I’m visiting a club I’ve not been to before, especially an old one, I enjoy strolling around the clubhouse and just soaking up the atmosphere. I like the welcome area displays that show off a club’s history, with a few record scorecards and famous club trophies, with the odd coincidence or impressive feat recorded for posterity. For me, it all adds to the experience you savour as a visitor. My first few minutes at Tralee GC were spent doing just this, but while there was plenty to indulge my golfing curiosity, it was the television screen scrolling through breathtaking panoramas of the golf course that really got me itching to tee it up.

To describe the course as photogenic would be a gross understatement. Here you can stand atop mountainous dunes and look out across Banna Strand to the Atlantic Ocean, and let your eyes roam over the undulating fairways and trace the spectacular holes that meander through the natural links land. Perhaps it helped that I caught Tralee on a gorgeous late summer afternoon, but it’s no exaggeration to say that the course afforded the best views I’ve ever witnessed on a golf course. I’ll concede that for nostalgia it’s tough to beat playing the last few holes towards the town at St. Andrews, but for sheer spectacular scenery, I don’t think anything I’ve seen comes close to Tralee.

As for the Arnold Palmer designed course, it lived up to expectations, and then some. While the back nine is rightly famed for its rugged beauty and breathtaking holes, I was already smitten by then, wooed by some superb holes on the outward nine. The reputation of the back nine (so good is it that Palmer was memorably quoted as saying: “I may have designed the first nine, but surely God designed the back nine”) has somewhat overshadowed the jewels on the front. In their own right they are good enough that, picked up and dropped anywhere else in the world, they’d by renowned as a world-class stretch of links in their own right. They only thing they suffer is proximity to an even better nine holes. And you’ll always get to those, so don’t be in too much of a hurry and just appreciate the quality of the outward loop in its own right.

It’s easy to see why Tralee sits comfortably amongst the best courses in Europe, if not the world. Quite simply, if you’re in the western half of Ireland, you have to play it.

Front Nine

The course impresses quickly at Tralee, with the par four 1st demanding you work hard for a par, though it can still fairly be described as a ‘gentle’ opener. Reaching the green, a glance back towards the clubhouse allows you to appreciate the change in elevation from your approach shot to the green.

If evidence were needed that the front nine at Tralee is going to offer something very special, you don’t have to wait long. The par 5 second is a spectacular, sweeping coast-hugger that requires shots into three different wind directions, each one demanding precision and concentration – not easy given the first grand view of the rugged Atlantic coastline.

The 3rd is considered the signature hole at Tralee, a nervy par three played in close proximity to the crashing waves, with the green sited just in front of a 14th Century Castle. Not one for the faint-hearted, it’s the first of many fabulous par threes.

Holes four and five flank each other, with mirrored elevation changes and doglegs. Be careful to avoid the old stone wall running alongside the fourth fairway, though, or it’ll claim your errant ball as another victim.

The sixth hole, with its sharp dogleg, guarantees an approach from the rough (depending on how much of the corner you chew) or from the humps and hollows in a fairway that resemble moguls on a ski run. It’s classic links golf, plus it offers an opportunity of a ‘risk and reward’ tee shot. I’m sure a four is an underrated score here.

With Tralee being a loop of two nines, the par three 7th turns the corner back towards the clubhouse. Between this and the birdie opportunity on the uphill par five 9th, is the cracking par four 8th that doglegs left whilst hugging the rugged coastline. Steep dunes and a shapely fairway frame this hole perfectly, and demand prudent course management in order to earn a score. It was certainly one of my favourite holes on the course, and I’d imagine it plays as one of the toughest. Presuming you’ve earned that birdie on the 9th, a quick stop in the halfway hut should recharge you for the remaining holes.

Back Nine

The par four 10th doglegs left down towards the dunes, and I’d advise against carving your drive into the adjacent field as it’s not easy from there, trust me. Still, it’s another solid par four, and you catch a glance at the lengthy par five 11th to come. There’s a premium on accuracy here as you ascend towards the highest point of the course. It’s another scoring opportunity for sure, but even if you don’t walk off with a birdie, the view from here is reward in itself.

The 12th hole for me was the best on the course. I loved it. Not least for the chance granted on the hole before to witness the groups in front attempting to traverse the incredibly testing second shot over the daunting ravine, so you’re fully aware of what’s to come. The drive is hard enough – it’s fairly obvious where to go, but it’s a semi-blind shot. Having managed to get this away, I thought I’d be left with a fairly straightforward short or medium iron to the putting surface, but was somewhat dismayed to find I actually had a huge carry that was going to test my abilities from a hanging lie with a fairway wood. No bail out area (unless you count a ‘lay-up’ pitch down the fairway – and let’s face it, I didn’t come to Tralee to protect my scorecard by playing ‘pat-a-cake’ golf), just the requirement to produce a Hollywood golf shot on demand. Whatever your resulting score, it’s a very special golf hole.

From there, the par three 13th is equally spectacular, a short iron to a narrow target with punishment surrounding the green on all sides. It’s at this point that you wonder how the course can get any better, but the final loop of holes continues to impress.

The 14th and 15th are two picturesque par four’s that seem to be play in relative calmness (perhaps due to their location near a small inlet), the latter requiring a careful tee shot played to a plateaux fairway and a controlled approach to a well guarded green.

The course then crescendos in elevation, drama, and quality of view over the par three 16th and par four 17th. Two world-class holes and two more candidates for my favourite on the course. The gentle par five 18th offers another good birdie chance, and is a fitting end to the most fantastic round of golf.

The most fitting end to the day however, is found upstairs in Tralee’s Golf Club Bar where the glass panelled clubhouse affords continued enjoyment of the golfing scenery. The food is great, as are the very welcoming members. Get a pint of Guinness and relive the day with your playing partners.

Racing to Predict Tiger’s Comback

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

So Tiger’s back. Or he isn’t. It all depends on your point of view.  One thing that is certainly back is the mountain of monotonous articles written on his every move, shot, thought, and interview. There seems to be a ramification, permutation, rhyme and reason for everything he does.  Forgive me a moment but… yawn.

I’d love to see Tiger back to his best, with subsequent articles lavishing praise on him for sensational victories, dominating performances, and impossible shots under pressure. But can we not save the headlines and questions until he produces just that?

You can’t help but feel that journalists believe there will be a certain amount of kudos bestowed upon them for being the first to rightly predict the dawn of the new Tiger era. Alright, I accept that they’re just doing their job and reporting on items that engage the readers, but it gets a bit ridiculous when he holes a putt and a commentator announces “I think you can safely say Tiger is back”. Crikey, I wish it was that easy for the rest of us. And isn’t it a little disrespectful to guys like Robert Rock that all the articles after this last weekend focused on the ‘nearly’ performance of Tiger rather than the ex-club pro who started the day level with the great Tiger Woods and beat him?

So he’s on the comeback trail, fine, but at the moment, that’s all you can say. A few years back, we were questioning why the best English players couldn’t get past the winning post in front of Woods. Now we have guys that do, but instead of focusing our attention on them, the trend is to question Tiger’s inadequacies.

Robert Rock is a prime example of how I believe golf has changed over the last ten years. A question was put to him on Saturday regarding his feelings on playing with Woods on Sunday, given that back in 2003 he was teaching golf and selling Mars bars, whilst Woods had won countless Majors and was dominating the sport. The answer, “It’s pretty cool’, was hardly insightful, but his performance on Sunday did all the talking. Ten years ago, most players would have done what the golfing media was expecting Rock to do and crumble under the pressure. Admittedly, a lot has happened in Woods’ career since those heydays, but he still has an aura. The difference is that ten years ago, when Rock, McIlroy, and the younger breed were still playing with a half set and from the ladies tees in a Junior Medal (or selling Mars bars), they were learning that in order to beat him, you had to raise the bar. It’s been the same in other sports, too. Just think of the impact Roger Federer has had on tennis. I’m sure Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic would be the first to tell you they wouldn’t be the players they are if they hadn’t had to set out to beat him.

In Tiger’s pomp, players hoped to get near to his level, but were resigned to losing once he had the lead. Now, players know they have to surpass the levels he set. I’m not suggesting Robert Rock is now a better player than Woods, but I think there is enough evidence over recent years to suggest that players know what levels they have to achieve in order to win. Previous statements such as “if Tiger plays well, we’re playing for second”, and “Tiger will win two majors per year, that only leaves two for the rest of us” are no longer valid. Tiger can play well and expect this generation to go toe-to-toe with him, regardless of how his supposed comeback is developing. Some even catch him on the last day now (Graeme MacDowell at the Chevron in 2010). That just didn’t happen before. Majors are won by guys who go out and seize their opportunity (Y.E.Yang beating Tiger at the PGA Championship), rather than by guys hoping Tiger’s game doesn’t show up.

Wood’s is certainly on his way back, but if he does get back to his best, the difference is that this time players aren’t scared to take him on. I’m sure he’ll have many victories in the future, including Majors, battling ones, and comfortable ones, but this generation will also inflict more defeats.

So there it is, an article complaining about the reams of paper wasted on Tiger in which I’ve managed to squeeze in 18 references to him.  Ah well, it’s an easy trap to fall in to.